End-to-End Example Project
This section brings everything together. We will walk through the creation of a real-world product: “AutoSupport”, an AI-powered customer support ticketing system.
The Scenario
Section titled “The Scenario”Client: “Need a system where users email support@company.com, and an AI automatically answers common questions or routes complex ones to a human.”
1. Planning: The Generative Backlog
Section titled “1. Planning: The Generative Backlog”Input: Meeting recording with the Client. AI Role:
- Transcribes the call.
- Generates the PRD: “System must classify emails as ‘Billing’, ‘Tech’, or ‘General’.”
- Generates User Stories:
- “As a User, I want instant replies to password reset requests.”
- “As an Agent, I want to see a summary of the email thread.”
2. Design: Architecture & Schema
Section titled “2. Design: Architecture & Schema”Input: The PRD. AI Role:
- Architecture: Suggests an Event-Driven architecture (Email -> SendGrid -> Azure Function -> OpenAI -> CRM).
- Schema: Generates the SQL schema for
TicketsandMessagestables. - Mermaid Diagram:
graph LR
Email[Inbound Email] -->|Webhook| Func[Azure Function]
Func -->|Classify| LLM[Azure OpenAI]
LLM -->|Billing?| QueueB[Billing Queue]
LLM -->|Tech?| QueueT[Tech Queue]
QueueB -->|Auto-Reply| Reply[SendGrid]
3. Build: Multi-Agent Coding
Section titled “3. Build: Multi-Agent Coding”Input: The Architecture + Schema. AI Role:
- Agent A (Database): Writes the Entity Framework Core models and migration scripts.
- Agent B (Logic): Writes the Azure Function code to parse the webhook and call OpenAI API.
- Agent C (Tests): Writes Unit Tests for the “Classification Logic” (e.g., ensuring “my bill is wrong” goes to Billing).
Human Role: Reviews the Classification Prompt to ensure it’s not rude.
4. Test: Self-Healing QA
Section titled “4. Test: Self-Healing QA”Input: The deployed Staging environment. AI Role:
- Generates synthetic emails: “Hey, I forgot my password”, “Why is my bill $500?”
- Runs integration tests: Sends email -> Checks database -> Verifies correct Queue.
- Self-Healing: A UI test fails because the “Ticket ID” field moved. AI fixes the selector.
5. Deploy: Risk-Gated Release
Section titled “5. Deploy: Risk-Gated Release”Input: Pull Request to main.
AI Role:
- Risk Analysis: “Changes affect the Email Processing Logic. Risk Score: 78/100.”
- Action: Triggers “Manual Approval” gate.
- IaC: Updates the Terraform to add a new Queue.
6. Operate: AIOps
Section titled “6. Operate: AIOps”Input: Production Logs. AI Role:
- Alert: “OpenAI API Rate Limit Exceeded.”
- RCA: “Agent retries are too aggressive.”
- Fix: “Suggest implementing Exponential Backoff.”
Full Workflow Diagram
Section titled “Full Workflow Diagram”sequenceDiagram
participant PM as Product Manager
participant Arch as Cloud Architect
participant Dev as Developer
participant QA as QA Engineer
participant Ops as DevOps
rect #C8E6FF
Note over PM: 1. Plan
PM->>AI: Generate Backlog
end
rect #FFFFC8
Note over Arch: 2. Design
Arch->>AI: Generate Architecture
end
rect #C8FFC8
Note over Dev: 3. Build
Dev->>AI: Scaffold Code
end
rect #FFE6C8
Note over QA: 4. Test
QA->>AI: Generate Test Data
end
rect #E6C8FF
Note over Ops: 5. Deploy & Run
Ops->>AI: Analyze Risk & Logs
end
Conclusion
Section titled “Conclusion”By applying the AI-Driven SDLC to AutoSupport, the team:
- Saved 40% of time on Requirement Gathering.
- Saved 60% of time on Boilerplate Code.
- Caught 3 critical bugs via AI-generated test cases.
- Deployed with confidence due to AI risk scoring.